On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 10:37 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Vitaly Mayatskikh skrev:
> > Short-living process returns its timeslice to the parent, this
> > affects process that creates a lot of such short-living threads,
> > because its not a parent for new threads.
>
> I don't see the point of sending patches for old Linux versions such as
> 2.6.21, unless it's something applicable to the -stable tree.
The older trees might want to have this, perhaps the .16 by Adrian,
certainly distros still care.
> Do recent kernels with CFS have the same problem?
Very much not comparable, as you probably guessed :-)
> > Patch fixes this issue and
> > doesn't break kabi as does the patch from reporter:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/7/21
>
> There's no kabi.
True.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
