On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should
> this regression be fixed for 2.6.23?
Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version?
You may get away with adding
void __kmalloc_size_too_large(void)
{
BUG();
}
somewhere if you use the particular compiler version causing trouble.
The compiler will then generate some useless code wasting processor
cycles due to not folding constants but it should(tm) work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
