On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 10:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > is that old enough to not have the smart X scheduler? The smart scheduler went into the server in like 2000. I don't think you've got any systems that old. XFree86 4.1 or 4.2, I can't remember which. > (probably > the GLX bug you mentioned) so i cannot reproduce the bug. With X server 1.3, I'm getting consistent crashes with two glxgear instances running. So, if you're getting any output, it's better than my situation. -- [email protected]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CFS review
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- References:
- Re: CFS review
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: CFS review
- Prev by Date: Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions
- Next by Date: Re: speeding up swapoff
- Previous by thread: Re: CFS review
- Next by thread: Re: CFS review
- Index(es):
 |