Re: [PATCH -rt 1/8] introduce PICK_FUNCTION

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Walker wrote:
PICK_FUNCTION() is similar to the other PICK_OP style macros, and was
created to replace them all. I used variable argument macros to handle
PICK_FUNC_2ARG/PICK_FUNC_1ARG. Otherwise the marcos are similar to the
original macros used for semaphores. The entire system is used to do a
compile time switch between two different locking APIs. For example,
real spinlocks (raw_spinlock_t) and mutexes (or sleeping spinlocks).

This new macro replaces all the duplication from lock type to lock type.
The result of this patch, and the next two, is a fairly nice simplification,
and consolidation. Although the seqlock changes are larger than the originals
I think over all the patchset is worth while.

Incorporated peterz's suggestion to not require TYPE_EQUAL() to only
use pointers.

How come this is cc'ed to lkml? Is it something that is relevant to
the mainline kernel... or?

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux