On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:59:53 MDT, Eric W. Biederman said: > It looks like you don't have CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL defined, and it > appears utsname_syscall and ipcdata_syscall both become NULL pointers > if they aren't needed. So the complaint is a false positive. Yep. Nothing I actually use needs SYSCTL_SYSCALL, so I turned it off to see what breaks...
Attachment:
pgpVeqZiVMUPT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- References:
- 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - irda goes belly up
- From: [email protected]
- Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - irda goes belly up
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
- Prev by Date: Crash report 2.6.22.5
- Next by Date: RE: ok to kill "ether=" kernel parm?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: Properly register the irda binary sysctl numbers.
- Index(es):