On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
> problem then how about the patch below?
I don't think it is.
> -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> P: Paul Moore
> M: [email protected]
> +W: http://netlabel.sf.net (NetLabel/CIPSO)
> L: [email protected]
> S: Maintained
My preference would be for something like:
NETLABEL and CIPSO
P: Paul Moore
M: [email protected]
W: http://netlabel.sf.net
L: [email protected]
S: Maintained
F: Documentation/netlabel/
F: include/net/netlabel.h
F: net/netlabel/
Labeled IPsec and SECMARK
P: Paul Moore
M: [email protected]
L: [email protected]
S: Supported
F: include/linux/netfilter/*SECMARK*
F: net/netfilter/*SECMARK*
I would like to add appropriate file patterns for each
block. Also, I'm not sure of the Supported/Maintained
status of each block.
The distinction is supposed to be:
Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this.
Maintained: Someone actually looks after it.
Could you please clarify those for me?
cheers, Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
