Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 11:22, James Chapman wrote:
So in this scheme what runs ->poll() to process incoming packets?
The hrtimer?
No, the regular NAPI networking core calls ->poll() as usual; no timers are involved. This scheme simply delays the napi_complete() from the driver so the device stays in the poll list longer. It means that its ->poll() will be called when there is no work to do for 1-2 jiffies, hence the optimization at the top of ->poll() to efficiently handle that case. The device's ->poll() is called by the NAPI core until it has continuously done no work for 1-2 jiffies, at which point it finally does the netif_rx_complete() and re-enables its interrupts.

I'm not sure if I understand your approach correctly.
This approach may reduce the number of interrupts, but it does so
by blocking the CPU for up to 1 jiffy (that can be quite some time
on some platforms). So no other application / tasklet / softIRQ type
can do anything in between.

I think I've misread the reworked NAPI net_rx_action code. I thought that it ran each device ->poll() just once, rescheduling the NET_RX softirq again if a device stayed in polled mode. I can see now that it loops while one or more devices stays in the poll list for up to a jiffy, just like it always has. So by keeping the device in the poll list and not consuming quota, net_rx_action() spins until the next jiffy tick unless another device consumes quota, like you say.

I can only assume that the encouraging results that I get with this scheme are specific to my test setups (measuring packet forwarding rates). I agree that it isn't desirable to tie up the CPU for up to a jiffy in net_rx_action() in order to do this. I need to go away and rework my ideas. Perhaps it is possible to get the behavior I'm looking for by somehow special-casing the zero return from ->poll() in net_rx_action(), but I'm not sure.

Thanks for asking questions.

--
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux