Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 15:55 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:

> Yet the model name looks strange. So we need to run one more test,
> as the fam/model is not enough. What we need to check is whether or
> not this processor implements architectural perfmon or not.
> 
> Could you please compile and run the attached program and send me 
> the output?

The output below is all the output ..

eax=0x7280201: version=1  num_cnt=2

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>

• References:
  • nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
    • From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] block_device_operations prototype changes
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] clean up exports in fs/{open,read_write}.c
• Previous by thread: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
• Next by thread: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]