Re: [PATCH 1/1] V3: hotplug cpu: migrate a task within its cpuset

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>]

On 08/27, Cliff Wickman wrote:
> 
> --- linus.070821.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linus.070821/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
>  #include <linux/delayacct.h>
>  #include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
>  #include <linux/unistd.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuset.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/tlb.h>
>  
> @@ -5091,6 +5092,19 @@ restart:
>  	if (dest_cpu == NR_CPUS)
>  		dest_cpu = any_online_cpu(p->cpus_allowed);
>  
> +	/* try to stay on the same cpuset */
> +	if (dest_cpu == NR_CPUS) {
> +		rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
> +		/*
> +		 * The cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked() variant of
> +		 * cpuset_cpus_allowed() will not block
> +		 * It must be called within calls to cpuset_lock/cpuset_unlock.
> +		 */
> +		p->cpus_allowed = cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(p);
> +		dest_cpu = any_online_cpu(p->cpus_allowed);
> +		task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);

No, no, we can't take task_lock() under rq->lock, nesting error. I think we
need a local "cpumask_t cpus_allowed = cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()", like
sched_setaffinity() does.

task_lock() doesn't disable irqs, this means that it can't be used under any
lock which can be used from interrupt context.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/