On Sat 2007-08-25 22:42:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 August 2007 20:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 24 August 2007 22:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > Make it possible to restore a hibernation image on x86_64 with the help of a
> > > > kernel different from the one in the image.
> > > >
> > > > The idea is to split the core restoration code into two separate parts and to
> > > > place each of them in a different page. The first part belongs to the boot
> > >
> > > What happens in case where both parts want to be
> > > at the same place? (Like kernel being restored is 4KB smaller, so that
> > > routines now collide?)
> >
> > Bad things, but I can't see how to avoid that reliably.
>
> Below is an analogous patch without this problem. The slightly ugly thing
> about it is that all pages in the temporary mapping have the NX bit cleard
> now, so that we can run some code out of one of them. Still, IMO, that isn't
> really important, because the temporary page tables are dropped as soon as
> we jump to restore_registers.
>
> Greetings,
> Rafael
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
>
> Make it possible to restore a hibernation image on x86_64 with the help of a
> kernel different from the one in the image.
>
> The idea is to split the core restoration code into two separate parts and to
> place each of them in a different page. The first part belongs to the boot
> kernel and is executed as the last step of the image kernel's memory restoration
> procedure. Before being executed, it is relocated to a safe page that won't be
> overwritten while copying the image kernel pages.
>
> The final operation performed by it is a jump to the second part of the core
> restoration code that belongs to the image kernel and has just been restored.
> This code makes the CPU switch to the image kernel's page tables and
> restores the state of general purpose registers (including the stack pointer)
> from before the hibernation.
>
> The main issue with this idea is that in order to jump to the second part of the
> core restoration code the boot kernel needs to know its address. However, this
> address may be passed to it in the image header. Namely, the part of the image
> header previously used for checking if the version of the image kernel is
> correct can be replaced with some architecture specific data that will allow
> the boot kernel to jump to the right address within the image kernel. These
> data should also be used for checking if the image kernel is compatible with
> the boot kernel (as far as the memory restroration procedure is concerned).
> It can be done, for example, with the help of a "magic" value that has to be
> equal in both kernels, so that they can be regarded as compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
ACK.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
