On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 05:40:00PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 03:40:23PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > Allow RAMFS to be user-selectable, and to be built as a module.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > given that the help content for that option suggests it can be built
> > > as a module, it just makes sense to make it selectable and tristate,
> > > unless someone has a compelling argument against it.
> >
> > How about "check if the kernel builds if you do that"?
>
> i did. i did a simple "make defconfig" and "make", and the kernel
> built fine. that patch didn't change the status of RAMFS in any way,
> it was still selected as default "y", so why would that patch have
> made any difference to the eventual build?
Your patch allows to make it a module. That seems to be the only point of
your patch. So check if it builds when RAMFS is made "m" or "n".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
