Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan-Bernd Themann,

                  IMO, a box must be aware of the speed of all its
interfaces, whether the
                  interface impliments tail-drop or RED or XYZ, the latency
to access the
                  packet, etc.

                  Then when a packet arrives, a timer is started for
interrupt colelesing,
                  and to process awaiting packets, if tail-drop is
implemented, it is
                  possible to wait until a the input FIFO fills to a
specific point before
                  starting a timer.

                  This may maximize the number of packets per interupt. And
realize that
                  the worse case of a interrupt per packet is wirespeed
pings (echo
                  request/reply) of 64 bytes per packet.

                   Mitchell Erblich




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux