Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface

From: David Stevens <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:50:58 -0700

>         Problem is if it increases rapidly, you may drop packets
> before you notice that the ring is full in the current estimated
> interval.

This is one of many reasons why hardware interrupt mitigation
is really needed for this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
    • From: [email protected] (Linas Vepstas)

• References:
  • Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
    • From: David Stevens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]