Hi Andrew,
With the "redefine register_hotcpu_notifier() stub as static inline
function" patch gone, I can no longer reproduce the section mismatches
mentioned in: x86_64-mce_amd-fix-section-mismatch-warnings.patch
[ The section annotations of that patch still stand, just the changelog
is no longer completely accurate. ]
If we care enough about this, I'm resubmitting that patch with updated
patch name and changelog here -- the content is same.
Satyam
[PATCH] x86_64 mce{_amd}: __cpuinit{data} section annotations
* mce.c:
CPU hotplug notifier callback function mce_cpu_callback() is not marked
__cpuinit and may thus go to the .text section unconditionally, but it
references mce_create_device() that is marked __cpuinit and may be
emitted into the .init.text section when HOTPLUG_CPU=n. This may cause
modpost to warn about this mismatch (in practice, though, the compiler
may elide the unreferenced callback function completely when
HOTPLUG_CPU=n therefore modpost may never warn).
Let us fix this by marking the callback as __cpuinit and corresponding
notifier_block as __cpuinitdata. Having done that, mce_remove_device()
is only ever called from __cpuinit marked functions so can be marked
__cpuinit itself.
* mce_amd.c:
Has an exactly similar issue as that discussed in previous case. Solve
it similarly by marking callback as __cpuinit and notifier_block as
__cpuinitdata. This causes a viral effect and allows us to mark a bunch
of other functions as __cpuinit also.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c | 6 +++---
arch/x86_64/kernel/mce_amd.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
index a66d607..5c0c4ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static __cpuinit int mce_create_device(unsigned int cpu)
return err;
}
-static void mce_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit mce_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
{
int i;
@@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void mce_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
}
/* Get notified when a cpu comes on/off. Be hotplug friendly. */
-static int
+static int __cpuinit
mce_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ mce_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
-static struct notifier_block mce_cpu_notifier = {
+static struct notifier_block mce_cpu_notifier __cpuinitdata = {
.notifier_call = mce_cpu_callback,
};
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce_amd.c
index 2f8a7f1..364c80b 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/mce_amd.c
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ out:
* of shared sysfs dir/files, and rest of the cores will be symlinked to it.
*/
-static void deallocate_threshold_block(unsigned int cpu,
+static void __cpuinit deallocate_threshold_block(unsigned int cpu,
unsigned int bank)
{
struct threshold_block *pos = NULL;
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static void deallocate_threshold_block(unsigned int cpu,
per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank]->blocks = NULL;
}
-static void threshold_remove_bank(unsigned int cpu, int bank)
+static void __cpuinit threshold_remove_bank(unsigned int cpu, int bank)
{
int i = 0;
struct threshold_bank *b;
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ free_out:
per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank] = NULL;
}
-static void threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
{
unsigned int bank;
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static void threshold_remove_device(unsigned int cpu)
}
/* get notified when a cpu comes on/off */
-static int threshold_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+static int __cpuinit threshold_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
/* cpu was unsigned int to begin with */
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static int threshold_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
-static struct notifier_block threshold_cpu_notifier = {
+static struct notifier_block threshold_cpu_notifier __cpuinitdata = {
.notifier_call = threshold_cpu_callback,
};
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]