Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just to be clear, in the previous email I posted on this thread, I
described a worst-case network ping-pong test case (send a packet, wait
for reply), and found out that a deffered interrupt scheme just damaged
the performance of the test case.  Since the folks who came up with the
test case were adamant, I turned off the defferred interrupts. While defferred interrupts are an "obvious" solution, I decided that they weren't a good solution. (And I have no other solution to offer).

Sounds exactly like the default netperf TCP_RR test and any number of other benchmarks. The "send a request, wait for reply, send next request, etc etc etc" is a rather common application behaviour afterall.

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux