On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > I reworked that patch and posted the update on 16aug which does not have > this problem: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118729871101418&w=4 > > This should replace > memoryless-nodes-fixup-uses-of-node_online_map-in-generic-code.patch > in -mm. Could you post a diff to rc3-mm1 of that patch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- RE: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted
- From: "Luck, Tony" <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Fix find_next_best_node (Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted)
- From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix find_next_best_node (Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted)
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [PATCH] Fix find_next_best_node (Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted)
- From: Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]>
- RE: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted
- Prev by Date: Re: errno codes intertwined
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix find_next_best_node (Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix find_next_best_node (Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix find_next_best_node (Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted)
- Index(es):
 |