On 8/24/07, Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > in some code that does like:
> > #define foo { a, b, c, \
> > d, e, f, g }
> > ...
> > int boo[] = foo;
> > ...
> >
> > checkpatch.pl throws a fit:
> > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis
> > #10: FILE: ...
> > +#define foo {a, b, c, d}
> >
> > perhaps the check should also allow {...} ? or ignore lists like this ...
> > -mike
>
> Ok, we can add that to the check. Next update will allow that.
>
> Thanks for the report.
I sent a reply accidentally only to Mike and not the list. I think the
error message is wrong. That is really ugly code. Linux Kernel code
believes in C not preprocessor tricks, so why would you need this?
Who uses code like this, by the way?
-sb
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
