On 10-08-2007 09:06, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> And the winner of today is ...
>
>
>
> =========================================================
> [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
> 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> runscript.sh/5843 just changed the state of lock:
> (_xmit_ETHER){-+..}, at: [<c03cbe79>] dev_watchdog+0x17/0xcc
> but this lock took another, soft-irq-unsafe lock in the past:
> (&tp->lock){--..}
>
> and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
...
> Really no idea who to CC here ;)
IMHO, this should be fixed by last changes to free_irq & request_irq.
(Seems to be possible only with CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ?) Otherwise I can
be CC-ed - my pleasure!
Cheers,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
