Re: [PATCH] sched: Reduce overhead in balance_tasks()

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> At the moment, balance_tasks() provides low level functionality for 
> both
>  move_tasks() and move_one_task() (indirectly) via the load_balance() 
> function (in the sched_class interface) which also provides dual 
> functionality.  This dual functionality complicates the interfaces and 
> internal mechanisms and makes the run time overhead of operations that 
> are called with two run queue locks held.
> 
> This patch addresses this issue and reduces the overhead of these 
> operations.

hm, i like it, and added it to my queue (probably .24 material though), 
but note that it increases .text and .data overhead:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  41028   37794    2168   80990   13c5e sched.o.before
  41349   37826    2168   81343   13dbf sched.o.after

is that expected?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/