On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
> > "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
> > >
> > > The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
> > > preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
> > > rcutorture's RNG to gather entropy from the new cpu_clock() interface
> > > (relying on interrupts, preemption, daemons, and rcutorture's reader
> > > thread's rock-bottom scheduling priority to provide useful entropy),
> > > and also adds and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() to make that interface available
> > > to GPLed kernel modules such as rcutorture.
> > >
> > > Passes several hours of rcutorture.
> >
> > Please explain what "conflict with" means so that I can work out if
> > this is a needed-in-2.6.23 change, thanks.
>
> Not needed in 2.6.23. This change falls into the "preparation for -rt"
> category. Also in the "don't unnecessarily eat entropy, leave some for
> the people needing crypographically secure randomness" category.
We've had several calls for a more fast and loose version of
get_random_bytes. Generalizing one of the cookie generation functions
is probably a good way to go.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
