On the day of Thursday 23 August 2007 Greg KH hast written: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:42:25PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:15:03PM +0200, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > even if Greg is waiting for some special invitation > > > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/14/229), I suggest putting this patch by > > > Ayaz on top: > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/296 > > > > That's what I prepare first, but then noticed it's not in mainline. > > > > > Perhaps Ayaz wants to give Greg the clarification he needs... :sigh: > > > > He should, as the fix is not in mainline either :-( > > I don't think Greg asks for specific clarification, just a plain patch > > with a short commit log on its own which does not include remains of > > older mails. > > Exactly, that is what I am waiting for. > > And also I need the change to go into mainline first, as we can not > diverge with the -stable releases. Can we get that into mainline then? I haven't seen forcedeth in MAINTAINERS, so I added netdev to the cc list. bye, -- (°= =°) //\ Prakash Punnoor /\\ V_/ \_V
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.20.17 review 35/58] forcedeth bug fix: realtek phy
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.20.17 review 35/58] forcedeth bug fix: realtek phy
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
- Prev by Date: Re: nf_conntrack_ipv4 must be loaded explicitly
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 35/58] forcedeth bug fix: realtek phy
- Next by thread: Re: [stable] [2.6.20.17 review 35/58] forcedeth bug fix: realtek phy
- Index(es):
 |