Re: [2.6.20.17 review 35/58] forcedeth bug fix: realtek phy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On the day of Thursday 23 August 2007 Greg KH hast written:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:42:25PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:15:03PM +0200, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > even if Greg is waiting for some special invitation
> > > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/14/229), I suggest putting this patch by
> > > Ayaz on top:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/296
> >
> > That's what I prepare first, but then noticed it's not in mainline.
> >
> > > Perhaps Ayaz wants to give Greg the clarification he needs... :sigh:
> >
> > He should, as the fix is not in mainline either :-(
> > I don't think Greg asks for specific clarification, just a plain patch
> > with a short commit log on its own which does not include remains of
> > older mails.
>
> Exactly, that is what I am waiting for.
>
> And also I need the change to go into mainline first, as we can not
> diverge with the -stable releases.

Can we get that into mainline then? I haven't seen forcedeth in MAINTAINERS, 
so I added netdev to the cc list.

bye,
-- 
(°=                 =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/                 \_V

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux