also sprach Alexander E. Patrakov <[email protected]> [2007.08.23.1730 +0200]: >> I am staring at this log message: >> kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64 >> and I cannot figure out what it's trying to tell me. Could someone >> please enlighten me? > > Looks like some DNS packet got logged by your firewall rules. But my firewall rules certainly do not log DNS packets, and if they did, it would look very differently, no? I always prefix my iptables LOG messages anyway. This is a Xen client, if it makes a difference. Now looking at it, it looks as if the log got garbled and 7.0.0.1:53 is really part of 127.0.0.1:53 (the machine does run a recursor). Can stuff like this happen that data is lost in this way before syslog can dump it? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck "convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." - friedrich nietzsche spamtraps: [email protected]
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- From: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <[email protected]>
- Re: what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- References:
- what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- From: martin f krafft <[email protected]>
- Re: what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- From: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <[email protected]>
- what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- Prev by Date: Re: what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Remove unused variables from fs/proc/base.c
- Previous by thread: Re: what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- Next by thread: Re: what does this mean: "kernel: 7.0.0.1:53 L=79 S=0x00 I=39869 F=0x4000 T=64"
- Index(es):
 |