Re: [PATCH] Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:19:53 +0100
Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Miloslav Trmac <[email protected]>
> 
> Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET to avoid a conflict with netlink message
> types already used in the wild.

which are these? Were they in mainline or -mm before?

also, if this is so sensitive, at least add something that says to never ever use 1014/1015...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] [PATCH] eCryptfs: fix possible fault in ecryptfs_sync_page
• Next by Date: Re: intel_rng: FWH not detected (and no entropy)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]