Re: [patch 0/6] Per cpu structures for SLUB

Hi,

while I like this patch set I'm at odds with the interaction of this and
making the alloc/free fast paths lockless. 

The main race is s->cpu_slab[] and c->freelist. How does one close that
gap?

(btw, have you looked at my -rt slub patch?)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/6] Per cpu structures for SLUB
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 0/6] Per cpu structures for SLUB
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc5 1/1] MM: enhance Linux swap subsystem
Next by Date: intel_rng: FWH not detected (and no entropy)
Previous by thread: [patch 1/6] SLUB: Avoid page struct cacheline bouncing due to remote frees to cpu slab
Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/6] Per cpu structures for SLUB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]