> The problem is they're two patching consecutively patching the same
> file with 100% identical subject/description.
>
> So either: they should be merged together into one patch
> or the second (or first) needs a new description/subject
They do the same thing for the x86_64 ia32-compat and x86_64 native vDSOs,
respectively.
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64 ia32 vDSO: install unstripped copies on disk
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86_64 vDSO: install unstripped copies on disk
Andrew called them
x86_64-ia32-vdso-install-unstripped-copies-on-disk
x86_64-vdso-install-unstripped-copies-on-disk
The names/subjects are not identical, but differ in having "ia32" or not.
That is really the only difference between the two patches, too.
> TBD this needs a proper changelog/subject from Roland. I have no idea what
> it does
I don't now what is unclear about the log entry. Yes, each log entry says
the same thing after the first (Subject) line. Each one relates to a
different arch/x86_64/subdirectory/Makefile that creates vDSO images.
Prepend "This applies to the x86_64/vdso native vDSO building." or
"This applies to the x86_64/ia32 vDSO building." to the log if you prefer.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
