Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hirokazu Takata wrote:
I think the parameter of atomic_read() should have "const" qualifier to avoid these warnings, and IMHO this modification might be
worth applying on other archs.

I agree.

Here is an additional patch to revise the previous one for m32r.

I'll incorporate this change if we get enough consensus to justify a re-re-re-submit. Since the patch is intended to be a functional no-op on m32r, I'm inclined to leave it alone at the moment.

I also tried to rewrite it with inline asm code, but the kernel text size
bacame roughly 2kB larger. So, I prefer C version.

You're not the only arch maintainer who prefers doing it in C. If you trust your compiler (a big "if", apparently), inline asm only improves code generation if you have a whole bunch of general purpose registers for the optimizer to play with.

	-- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux