On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:45:33AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Measurements on a AMD64 2.0 GHz dual-core > > In this test, we seem to remove 10 cycles from the kmalloc fast path. > On small allocations, it gives a 14% performance increase. kfree fast > path also seems to have a 10 cycles improvement. Looks good. Anything that makes kmalloc faster is good -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
- Next by Date: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local
- Index(es):
 |