Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:

> I got a problem with SELinux
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.20.17-rc1/console.log
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.20.17-rc1/stable-config

Please set
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_ENABLE_SECMARK_DEFAULT=n

You don't have complete policy for the new network controls, which are not 
enabled by default and not integreated fully into distros yet.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
  - From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
- Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
  - From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

References:
- [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
  - From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
  - From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Oops: Machine check, sig: 7 [#1]
Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3-mm1] request_irq fix DEBUG_SHIRQ handling Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1: rtl8139 inconsistent lock state
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
Next by thread: Re: [2.6.20.17 review 00/58] 2.6.20.17 -stable review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]