Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

> This patch also means I can kill off the emulation code in
> drivers/lguest/core.c, which is a real relief.

But would it be faster? If not or only insignificant amount I think I would 
prefer you keep it. Hooking IO is quite intrusive because it's done
by so many drivers.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ver_linux is [censored]
• Next by Date: Re: Problems with IDE on linux 2.6.22.X
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]