Re: [PATCH] Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:52:21 -0700
Cc: Virtualization Mailing List <[email protected]>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>, Chris Wright <[email protected]>, Rusty Russell <[email protected]>, Andi Kleen <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

No, under Xen the kernel/hypervisor PMD is not shared between processes,
so this is still used when PAE is enabled.

Ahh, yes. So this was a lucky catch for us. Non-PAE kernels seem to beincreasing in value at antique sales.


Zach

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
  - From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Lguest] [PATCH] turn err into errx in lguest call sites
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
Next by thread: [BUG?] 2.6.23-rc3 on alpha
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux