* Christoph Lameter ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > - Rounding error.. you seem to round at 0.1ms, but I keep the values in
> > cycles. The times that you get (1.1ms) seems strangely higher than
> > mine, which are under 1000 cycles on a 3GHz system (less than 333ns).
> > I guess there is both a ms - ns error there and/or not enough
> > precision in your numbers.
>
> Nope the rounding for output is depending on the amount. Rounds to one
> digit after whatever unit we figured out is best to display.
>
> And multiplications (cyc2ns) do not result in rounding errors.
>
Ok, I see now that the 1.1ms was for the 10000 iterations, which makes
it about 230 ns/iteration for the 10000 times kmalloc(8) = 2.3ms test.
As I am going back through the initial cmpxchg_local implementation, it
seems like it was executing __slab_alloc() with preemption disabled,
which is wrong. new_slab() is not designed for that.
I'll try to run my tests on AMD64.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
