Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.

On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:50:42 EDT, John Stoffel said:

> Now maybe those issues are raised when you have a Linux NFS server
> with Solaris clients.  But in my book, reliable NFS servers are key,
> and if they are reliable, 'soft,intr' works just fine.

And you don't need all that ext3 journal overhead if your disk drives
are reliable too.  Gotcha. :)

Attachment: pgp6EFjaZwdHp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
    • From: "John Stoffel" <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>

• References:
  • NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
    • From: Robin Lee Powell <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
    • From: "John Stoffel" <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
    • From: Peter Staubach <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
    • From: "John Stoffel" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: input: limit memory allocated by uinput ff drivers
• Next by Date: Re: Problems with IDE on linux 2.6.22.X
• Previous by thread: Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
• Next by thread: Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]