On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:54:33PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> We currently support 6 different stable gcc release series plus heavily
> modified vendor branches like 3.3-hammer. We can discuss whether it is
> now already the right time, and where to make the cut, but medium-term
> we must reduce the number of supported compilers.
I don't think that's feasible. We're dealing with a situation where:
- GCC aim to release a new compiler series every 6 months.
Fortunately, they don't achieve this goal, but they do release every
12 months or thereabouts [1].
- Enterprise distros are supported for seven years
- We still care about people being able to compile kernels on
enterprise distros that are still supported by their vendor.
Yes, it causes us some pain to support all these different compilers,
but it's not *that* big a pain.
[1] Release dates, according to the GCC website
2007-05-17 4.2.0 (14 months)
2006-02-28 4.1.0 (10 months)
2005-04-20 4.0.0 (12 months)
2004-04-20 3.4.0 (11 months)
2003-05-20 3.3 (12 months, ignoring gcc 3.2 which was really 3.1.2)
2002-05-15 3.1 (11 months)
2001-06-18 3.0
--
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
