Re: [accounting regression since rc1] scheduler updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Am Dienstag, 21. August 2007 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> > the 'invariant' i mentioned only covers scheduler behavior, not 
> > accounting behavior. Accounting is separate in theory, but coupled in 
> > practice now via sum_exec_runtime.
> 
> Forgot to answer about that: That means that the current design does 
> not cover our requirement of showing process real time, even if we 
> implement sched_clock? In that case I would suggest to merge my patch 
> as a quick but correct solution and do it properly for 2.6.24. Of 
> course better solutions are welcome :-)

you mean to revert b27f03d4bd? I'd really like to see this fixed for 
real for s390 + CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y. (which seems to be the 
only case affected)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux