On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:27:06AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday August 20, [email protected] wrote:
> > (cc's to me appreciated)
> >
> > It would be really, really nice if "umount -f" against a hung
> > NFS mount actually worked on Linux. As much as I hate Solaris,
> > I consider it the gold standard in this case: If I say "umount
> > -f /mount/that/is/hung" it just goes away, immediately, and
> > anything still trying to use it dies (with EIO, I'm told).
>
> Have you tried "umount -l"? How far is that from your
> requirements?
I actually talked about that further down. The short version: quite
far.
The long version:
It leaves a bunch of hung processes, with no real way for me to
determine which processes are hung on the now-non-existent mount,
and (at least with autofs) it leaves /etc/mtab in an inconsistent
state, so I had to edit it to restart autofs. Only a mild
improvement on rebooting, says I.
Also, it took a really long time (minutes) to return.
> Alternately:
> mount --move /problem/path /somewhere/else
> umount -f /somewhere/else
> umount -l /somewhere/else
>
> might be a little closer to what you want.
I don't think that would solve the problem: the umount -f would
still hang and eventually return busy, fuser would still hang, and
umount -l would still leave inconsistent crap lying around.
> Though I agree that it would be nice if we could convince all
> subsequent requests to a server to fail EIO instead of just the
> currently active ones. I'm not sure that just changing "umount
> -f" is the right interface though.... Maybe if all the server
> handles appeared in sysfs and have an attribute which you could
> set to cause all requests to fail...
I have no opinion on interface details, I simply know that on
Solaris, "umount -f" Just Works, and I would love to have similar
behaviour on Linux.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]