On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > I'm digging in the slub with cmpxchg_local patch... first detail: > slab_alloc seems to have a return path that does not reenable > preemption... I'll keep you posted when I finish the 2.6.23-rc2-mm2 > port. I have a patchset here if that would help you? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- References:
- [patch 00/23] cmpxchg_local and cmpxchg64_local implementation
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/23] cmpxchg_local and cmpxchg64_local implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption
- Next by Date: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and 80486
- Index(es):
 |