On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:52 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The problem is with the optimization flags: passing -Os causes the compiler > to be stupid and not inline any memset/memcpy functions. you get what you ask for.. if you don't want that then don't ask for it ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- References:
- [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- Next by Date: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [gfs2][RFC] readdir caused ls process into D (uninterruptible) state, under testing with Samba 3.0.25
- Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64: memset optimization
- Index(es):
 |