"Felix Marti" <[email protected]> writes:
> > avoidance gains of TSO and LRO are still a very worthwhile savings.
> So, i.e. with TSO, your saving about 16 headers (let us say 14 + 20 +
> 20), 864B, when moving ~64KB of payload - looks like very much in the
> noise to me.
TSO is beneficial for the software again. The linux code currently
takes several locks and does quite a few function calls for each
packet and using larger packets lowers this overhead. At least with
10GbE saving CPU cycles is still quite important.
> an option to get 'high performance'
Shouldn't you qualify that?
It is unlikely you really duplicated all the tuning for corner cases
that went over many years into good software TCP stacks in your
hardware. So e.g. for wide area networks with occasional packet loss
the software might well perform better.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
