Chris Wright wrote:
> That did get backed out (at least the part that broke paravirt patching)
> in 602033ed5907a59ce86f709082a35be047743a86. Linus' tree should be
> working fine right now with d34fda4a84c18402640a1a2342d6e6d9829e6db7
> committed, and can be further refined with the patch below that's just
> waiting on some further testing.
>
I don't think this is necessary. It isn't worth complicating the
interface to avoid the memcpy.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/12] x86 Late merge bug fixes for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [0/12] x86 Late merge bug fixes for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: usb & udev
- Next by Date: Re: kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:27!
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [5/12] x86_64: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
- Index(es):
 |