Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit

On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 08:26:24PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:

> ISTR the warning was the other way around:   about "cast from integer
> to pointer of a different size".  The __u64 came from userspace and
> the kernel pointer was only 32 bits.  Not really truncation, but GCC
> could not know that directly ... ergo the extra non-pointer cast.

And?  Cast to integer type with the size equal to that of pointer.
unsigned long is just that on all supported targets.

More interesting question is whether you want an error returned when
pointers are 32bit and value doesn't fit into that...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit
    • From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ensure we don't use bootconsoles after init has been released
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/12] Blackfin arch: Add label to call new GPIO API
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ptrdiff_t is not uintptr_t, damnit
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]