Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> Is the -fno-omit-frame-pointer still required for some reason, or is 
> this a relict that could be removed?

It's needed so that the WCHAN /proc display can backtrace one
level up out of schedule()

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/12] Blackfin arch: Add label to call new GPIO API
• Next by Date: Re: HTC as USB gprs/edge modem on linux
• Previous by thread: Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?
• Next by thread: Re: sched.c: why -fno-omit-frame-pointer?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]