Laurent Vivier wrote:
So I think it is okay to have the same limitation for guest time.OK, so we can go back to my first patch. Who can decide to introduce this into the kernel ?
The sched.c parts are best merged by Ingo, and I can carry the kvm parts. Alternatively, I can carry the entire patchset if Ingo acks it.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- From: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- From: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- From: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
- Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- From: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
- [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- Prev by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 4/4, second shot]KVM uses "account_guest_time()"
- Next by Date: [PATCH 1/4] maps: PSS(proportional set size) accounting in smaps
- Previous by thread: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- Next by thread: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
- Index(es):
 |