Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems

[Alan <alan@clueserver.org>]

On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 13:22 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2007, at 13:09:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > The idea is that people have permissions - not files.  By people I  
> > mean users, groups, managers, applications
> > etc. One might even specify that there are no permission  
> > restrictions at all. Part of the process would be that the kernel  
> > load what code it will use for the permission system. It might even  
> > be a little perl script you write.
> >
> > Also - you aren't even giving permission to access files. It's  
> > permission to access name patterns. One could apply REGEX masks to  
> > names to determine permissions. So if you have permission to the  
> > name you have permission to the file.
> 
> Please excuse me, I'm going to go stand over in the corner for a minute.
> 
> *hahahahahaa hahahahahaaa hahaa hoo hee snicker sniff*
> 
> *wanders back into the conversation*
> 
> Sorry about that, pardon me.
> 
> I suspect you will find it somewhat hard to convince *anybody* on  
> this list to put either a regex engine or a Perl interpreter into the  
> kernel.  I doubt you could even get a simple shell-style pattern  
> matcher in.  First of all, both of the former chew up enormous gobs  
> of stack space *AND* they're NP-complete.  You just can't do such  
> matching even in polynomial time, let alone something that scales  
> appropriately for an OS kernel like, say, O(log(n)).

Already been done.  Take a look at "AppArmor" aka "Immunix".


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/