Now that we don't pre-allocate the new ->sighand, we can kill the first fast
path, it doesn't make sense any longer. At best, it can save one "list_empty()"
check but leads to the code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
--- t/fs/exec.c~4_FASTPATH 2007-08-18 19:10:58.000000000 +0400
+++ t/fs/exec.c 2007-08-18 19:34:12.000000000 +0400
@@ -779,16 +779,6 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct
struct task_struct *leader = NULL;
int count;
- /*
- * If we don't share sighandlers, then we aren't sharing anything
- * and we can just re-use it all.
- */
- if (atomic_read(&oldsighand->count) <= 1) {
- signalfd_detach(tsk);
- exit_itimers(sig);
- return 0;
- }
-
if (thread_group_empty(tsk))
goto no_thread_group;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
