Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> Opinions as to why FASTCALL breaks on one machine are welcome.

Could we get rid of FASTCALL? AFAIK the compiler should automatically 
choose the right calling convention?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v4
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: kfree(0) - ok?
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Cyclades: Avoid label defined but not used warning
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]