Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> Opinions as to why FASTCALL breaks on one machine are welcome.

Could we get rid of FASTCALL? AFAIK the compiler should automatically 
choose the right calling convention?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v4
  - From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
  - From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: kfree(0) - ok?
Next by Date: [PATCH] Cyclades: Avoid label defined but not used warning
Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]