On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 19:18 +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
>
> IPC code is good, EIDRM is justification of EINVAL. But neither SVr4 nor SVID \
> documents EIDRM. Single Unix Specification mentions EINVAL but not EIDRM as a \
> possible failure for shmctl(), so the current kernel behavior is not merely \
> self-inconsistent but a flat violation of the spec.
these specs tend to always allow additional error codes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
