Re: [PATCH] [428/2many] MAINTAINERS - SERIAL ATA (SATA) SUBSYSTEM:

On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 19:45 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> [email protected] wrote:
> > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
> > +F:	drivers/ata/sata_*
>     The libata core doesn't match this pattern, ain't a a vital part of both 
> SAT and PATA drivers?
> MBR, Sergei

Improvements to the pattern would be appreciated.
Would this be a better pattern?

F:	drivers/ata/

There is a SATA-promise maintainer

        PROMISE SATA TX2/TX4 CONTROLLER LIBATA DRIVER
        P:	Mikael Pettersson
        M:	[email protected]
        L:	[email protected]
        S:	Maintained
        F:	drivers/ata/sata_promise.*

maybe there should be an entry to exclude
this maintained driver too?

X:	drivers/ata/sata_promise.*

cheers,  Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [428/2many] MAINTAINERS - SERIAL ATA (SATA) SUBSYSTEM:
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH] [428/2many] MAINTAINERS - SERIAL ATA (SATA) SUBSYSTEM:
    • From: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Testing the Current Upstream Kernel
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: annotate rcu_read_{,un}lock()
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [428/2many] MAINTAINERS - SERIAL ATA (SATA) SUBSYSTEM:
• Next by thread: [PATCH] [232/2many] MAINTAINERS - I2C-TINY-USB DRIVER
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]