On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 22:30 +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Patch removed until there is a consensus on how to proceed with your proposal.
Hi Wim.
I think that's wise.
I've got all the changes that people have CC'd me.
I expect it'll be an all or nothing sort of thing.
Even if it's nothing, the content tracking parts
might be useful if another of the proposals floating
'round gets implemented.
I personally find the distributed MAINTAINERS approach
a bit odd given that there isn't really a single place
for many of the parts of a maintained block to be.
The single MAINTAINERS is too "hot" to use Linus' word.
I rather like the Maintainers/* block approach myself.
Unless that's rejected out of hand, that's what I'll
submit tomorrow.
cheers, Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
