Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a new field `name' to struct linux_binfmt

On 8/16/07, Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:20:23PM +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
> > A second blackfin arch patch will use this field to distinguish `flat'
> > binfmt with `FDPIC ELF'.
>
> Please, post it. It a bit hard to see what you're actually trying to do.

he already did ...
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/571072
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/2] Add a new field `name' to struct linux_binfmt
    • From: Jie Zhang <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a new field `name' to struct linux_binfmt
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [540/2many] MAINTAINERS - WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a new field `name' to struct linux_binfmt
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] Blackfin: Deal with flat binfmt differently to FDPIC ELF binfmt when dumping
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]