Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem

Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:30:28PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hmmm... That's timeout on cache flush, indicative of failing disk.
> > Please post the result of 'smartctl -a /dev/sdc'.
> 
> Ok, so something is fishy in 2.6.22 wrt. SMART.

See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/8/198

-jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
  - From: Gabor Gombas <[email protected]>
- Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
  - From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
  - From: Gabor Gombas <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
Previous by thread: Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]