Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem

Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:30:28PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hmmm... That's timeout on cache flush, indicative of failing disk.
> > Please post the result of 'smartctl -a /dev/sdc'.
> 
> Ok, so something is fishy in 2.6.22 wrt. SMART.

See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/8/198

-jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
    • From: Gabor Gombas <[email protected]>
  • Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
    • From: Gabor Gombas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
• Previous by thread: Re: sata_nv + ADMA + Samsung disk problem
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] af_packet: don't enable timestamps in mmap'ed sockets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]